angelophile: (A Little Superior)
Angelophile ([personal profile] angelophile) wrote2009-12-21 10:39 am

F*** you I won't do what you tell me! Unless it's buy this single.



So, this year's Christmas number one is Rage Against the Machine with Killing in the Name Of. Thanks to a "grass roots" internet campaign to keep Simon Cowell's latest X-Factor act off the top spot.

Now, leaving aside the fact that Cowell and Sony Records are the big winners here, since both songs come from Sony (in fact, I half expect it to be revealed that one of the masterminds behind it is a Sony employee - "Double your sales in one go!"), I've heard this hailed as a victory for "people power".

"People power"? Who did they think were buying the X-Factor single for the last few years? Penguins?

Because, to me, the 19.1 million who tuned in to watch the final episode of this series of X-Factor is people power. The millions who rang up and voted for the winner, people power too. I don't see any real victory here for people power. There's the complaint about manufactured pop, but what was this campaign but manufactured? And what has it changed? The people who bought the single this week will be gone tomorrow.

What this has done is proven how utterly irrelevant the UK singles chart has become. That was pretty much a given already when all the chart shows, including Top of the Pops, cancelled after 42 years, were pulled from the schedules. But it pretty much sums it up when an obscure internet campaign on Facebook can shift enough copies to claim a Christmas number one. Adding to that is the fact that a show that got 19.1 million tuning in doesn't actually bring about enough sales to beat out an obscure internet campaign - people might be happy phoning in to make someone the next big pop star, but they're not actually buying the damn singles to support that - X-Factor is about TV and not music, and while that's a fair point to make, I don't think this campaign's made it as well as they thought. Why? Because to make the charts about the music, not the hype, people should have just been buying the song they liked most, not the one they were told to buy, either by the internet or TV.

Now we've just got stuck with another novelty Christmas number one which will be forgotten next year. And where's the victory there?

[identity profile] wardytron.livejournal.com 2009-12-21 10:49 am (UTC)(link)
It's hats off to the marketing team at Sony BMG for managing to engineer a false chart battle between Good and Evil, where both are owned by Sony BMG, for the second successive year, and hats firmly on to the prize spacks who bought the Rage Against the Machine single, for making a futile gesture and enriching the faceless corporation they thought they were rebelling against, and for buying a shit single.

[identity profile] angelophile.livejournal.com 2009-12-21 11:27 am (UTC)(link)
Topping the list of things I wished I'd said today is Kieron Gillen's comment: "The thing I don't understand is the argument from both sides that Killing... isn't a pop single. It's Come On Eileen for metalheads FFS".

[identity profile] wardytron.livejournal.com 2009-12-21 11:36 am (UTC)(link)
But the actual experience of listening to Come On Eileen isn't anywhere near as horrible, is it. There are violins and things, rather than pneumatic drills and hoovers and a boy shouting at you.

[identity profile] foxhack.livejournal.com 2009-12-21 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Rage is a horrible band which is as fake, if not more, than the Backstreet Boys.

I thought that back when they were "new". I still think that now. Ooooooh look at us we're anti establishment! And we do concerts and sell t-shirts for $25 a pop.

[identity profile] angelophile.livejournal.com 2009-12-21 02:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Quite. To be fair, though, they're contributing "most of the proceeds" from the re-release of the single to the Shelter charity. Given the lead singer's comments where he acted like the band were somehow actively involved in the campaign rather than just benefiting from it, I'm cynical about it being any kind of altruistic gesture on their part, though.

And their "anarchy" stance can't be any more embarrassing than Chumbawumba's anyway.

[identity profile] kirke-novak.livejournal.com 2010-01-01 04:54 pm (UTC)(link)
The thing is, The Climb by Joe is just a blah song. The producers didn't even try to put any effort in making it sound original. It's perfectly average. People buy it because they love the guy, fair enough, I would buy the shit out of anything Chris Colfer ever records because I love the guy but the fact that it's so very much expected that the XF winner gets a number 1 single, they'd just stopped trying in the slightest. Heck, Joe didn't even want to sing this song, he didn't like it, it was Simon's decision.

KITN is totally my kind of song - it invokes emotions in me and that's what I like in my music. So yeah, totally team RATM. plus, it made Simon angry. So yeah