But the "existing studio" Runaways (and some of the other studios) has a deal under is "Marvel Studios", which is also now brought under Disney (in fact, that's probably the primary reason they bought the company, for the movie division). Remember? They were one of the first big (to me, at least) announcements about their solo division and we were all pleased because Marvel would have complete control? Well, now Marvel's controlled by somebody else.

In fact, in any deal where Marvel has a specific say in the production (rather than just invited out of politeness), it's hard to imagine that Disney will have 'no influence' unless they specifically decide not to have influence, because Disney can, at least theoretically, influence Marvel to influence it in ways they want.

So I don't see how "they'll have no influence on it" can really be realistic, especially if it's a case where, in the minds of Marvel Studios, casting Disney stars is a good thing (since it'll mean box office benefit). They see it as a good idea, so does Disney, and since they're all affiliated now, even if there is some disconnect, it's much easier to 'make it happen'.

But I agree the benefit of pushing lesser known characters in the mainstream is definitely a good thing, and, if nothing else, we could get some really good Marvel-based cartoons out of this.